发信人: lablue (LA.Blue), 信区: Biology
标 题: Re: Biochemistry这个杂志怎么样阿？（就是ACS的那个）
发信站: The unknown SPACE (Thu Apr 11 17:11:39 2002) WWW-POST

JBC has a lot of solid raw data. That's why they are often quoted.
but most of the data is not sufficient enough to build a fun, sexy
story, and without that, the paper is destined to be out of favor
by top-notch journals. So JBC paper is usually boring and people
publish only because they have some data they need to publish, and
the data looks real and good.

Any good data with combination of an interesting story will for sure
go into a higher-tier category such as EMBO and NCB.

【 在 tetsuhashi (lulu) 的大作中提到: 】
: just you don't understand. Otherwise, why is the IF so high (>7.3)
: 【 在 blaudonau (Alps) 的大作中提到: 】
: : J B C has much high impact factor thatis ture
: : but really full of a lot of shit
: : hoho
: :
: : 【 在 iav (damn it) 的大作中提到: 】
: : : I think you are saying about Journal of Biochemistry, but not the
journal
: : : of biological chemistry.
: : : I was confused by these titles for very long time. :-(((
: : : 【 在 penh (怕怕~与bbs共存亡) 的大作中提到: 】
: : : : i heard that biochemistry is much better than jbc. jbc is considered
as
: j of
: : : : bullshit collection.
: :
: :
:
:

--
I AM ET
等到风景都看透, 也许我会陪你看细水长流

※ 来源:．The unknown SPACE bbs.mit.edu．[FROM: 164.54.161.115]