发信人: leohawk (leohawk), 信区: Biology
标 题: Re: question about microscope
发信站: The unknown SPACE (Wed Jun 25 22:29:14 2003), 转信

I worked on both, confocal only take a thin layer of image, while
deconvolution takes whole image and use algorithm to clean up
the pic.

as to which one is better, it is definitely a case by case thing, I did
whole mount life sample on confocal once, it was ok... I never
tried it over deconvolution though.

some deconvolution can give a pseudo image after strong calculation, however,
it will totally be your call as to take it or not.

【 在 leeky (leky) 的大作中提到: 】
: I know both confocal microscope and Deconvolution Microscope can
: improve the pic quality. Who know which type is better?
: Or they are suitible for different specimen?


--
※ 来源:．The unknown SPACE bbs.mit.edu．[FROM: 204.52.]