发信人: tenesix (Quantum), 信区: Biology
标 题: Re: Good speaker or good thinker?
发信站: Unknown Space - 未名空间 (Tue Mar 2 17:06:52 2004), 转信

people are different.
Most commonly, people are good at some aspects and not as good at some aspects.
We call those good at many things genius:)
So for normal people not so gifted, some are good speakers, many of them, if
not most, can just talk nonthing for a long time with very good
organization and control, have you ever been in the talks from Deans or
Presidents:)
Meanwhile, for other people with creative thoughts, it is quite possible
that they can excite themselves but nobody else. Have you ever been in
a tedious speech from a famous guy(Let's suppose the creative idears are
originated from him and not stolen from others, although it is still
possible:) ?

Basically, I disagree with what you are trying to claim.

What I agree with you is that to get real positive response, you need to be a
good thinker first and to be a not so bad talker in the same time.


【 在 leohawk (leohawk) 的大作中提到: 】
: are there any difference?
: I have seen a lot of people comment on others or some professors as
: "good talker", at the same time, over looking the fact that they are, just
: as they are good talker, are very good thinker who can come up with
: good ideas and make correlation between different fields in biology.
: We have a natural tendence to look down upon those who talks but don't
: do much. However, the ability to talk means first you will have something
: to present, which requires a lot of reading, thinking, organizing before
: you talk.
: just my 2 c


--
----------------------------------------------
南牧羊

泉涸，鱼相与处于陆，相濡以沫，相掬以湿，不若相忘于江湖。

[庄子·大宗师]

※ 修改:．tenesix 于 Mar 2 17:10:31 修改本文．[FROM: 129.22.]
※ 来源:．Unknown Space - 未名空间 mitbbs.com．[FROM: 129.22.]