发信人: areborn (迈向新天地), 信区: Biology
标 题: Re: About JBC
发信站: Unknown Space - 未名空间 (Tue Apr 27 21:31:26 2004) WWW-POST

we have several times thatthe comments from JBC reviewer is very strange.
recently we had a paper, rejected by JBC but accepted by EMBO. That
really is good work but JBC reviewer can not understand it.
we feel the mechanism of JBC is not so good. But maybe they have to deal
with so many papers, that they can only do the best like this.

【 在 flyingcaddle (江湖再见) 的大作中提到: 】
: I just saw the nice talk about JBC. I want to point out that it is more fair
: to say that JBC is a very good journal to publish papers having a lot
: biochemical data including enzymology and biochemical approaches, as far as
to
: those about developmentand cell biology, it is definitely not a good choice
to
: send your paper there. Another thing I want to remind you guys that JBC has
: only one peer reviewer, this is probably partial reason that it also
published
: bull shit papers a lot.
:
:


--
※ 来源:．Unknown Space - 未名空间 mitbbs.com．[FROM: 136.160.]