发信人: jonzhang (清华MM的海鸥乔纳森), 信区: Biology
标 题: Re: need your suggestions and help ,pls!
发信站: Unknown Space - 未名空间 (Fri Sep 17 09:45:31 2004) WWW-POST

Dont totally understand what you mean by crossing crossing, crossing. Do you
mean the combination of those diferent knockouts?

The in vivo study is surely of greater value, no matter in publishing paper or
finding a job. However, in vitro study is more specific, and quicker. The
ideal approach is the combo of both.

BTW, the hypothesis, or scientific reasoning is more critical than the model
you use. While you dont wanna dedicate to pure theoretical biology though.

Again, what research interest they have is of greater value. For example,
cancer is getting less money, but it's still ok to get some papers or jobs.
Stem cell, either adult or embryonic, is one of the hottest spots, which will
yield some applicable stuff in decades. Neuroscience is cooling down after the
Brain Decade/Ten years project of NIH. ...

More discussions about the current proceeding in biol are welcome.

【 在 liuxiyan (新瓷器时代) 的大作中提到: 】
: Which of the two lab is better?
: 1, research about mice model using classical genetics. Always crossing
: crossing and waiting for the mice to breed.
: Sometimes trying to generate chimeric mice. That is to wash the emryo
cells
: from two strains from the ducts and blend them and then try to generate a
new
: miuse. Is the success of this kind of experiments only depends on luck?
:
: 2, Using molecular, tissue culture methos to generate the model. Quicker
than
: the former one. But this is not the real animal,right?
:
: I wonder if the classical genetics will be out-dated and will disappear when
: time goes on. But I am really new in this field. Perhaps my comments are
: totally wrong.................
:
: //thanks for any of your suggestions and information.
:

--
NEVER, NEVER, NEVER QUIT -- W. CHURCHILL

※ 来源:．Unknown Space - 未名空间 mitbbs.com．[FROM: 141.214.]